![]() 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006 ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Here is the latest update. I could have had a little more, unfortunately this morning on the drive to work I forgot to connect the GPS to the serial port on the laptop. The GPS was on, just not connected. :) oops. So I backtracked my way home to redo the lost positions. Overall I was able to get about 52 APs. WarDriving #9 Sometime next week I'm going to try something just to show the different between running a Active(Netstumbler) scanner and a Passive(Kismet) one. All this week I have been using Netstumbler(NS) to grab all those AP's. Unlike Kismet, Netstumbler only displays AP's with SSID beacon turned on, and it 'sends' a request to the AP and waits for a reply. Once it does it logs that AP. Kismet on the other hand shows AP's even if the SSID beacon is turned off. Kismet only listens, and it does a good job at that. As you will see the difference next week. logged by Digiital( ) at Friday, July 04, 2003 ![]()
Comments:
Post a Comment
|